Taking aim with his rifle, Lars manages to blast the Sith Lord straight in the skull, granting Kenobi a sobering reprieve. Kenobi is given the opportunity to cut Maul down without mercy, and the temptation to give into the years of pain caused by Maul leaves him frozen - but Owen of all people intervenes. Though obviously Maul faces defeat in the end, it’s not without cost. Meanwhile, we see Kenobi at his most brutal, demonstrating his prowess in multiple regards. It’s implied that Maul decapitated Watto, among several other grievous acts, stalking Obi-Wan to the homestead over many months. Where the pair’s confrontation in Star Wars: Rebels was optimistic and contemplative, “Old Wounds” is the exact opposite, capturing the barbarous cruelty of Revenge of the Sith. It’s an excellent 13-page rematch between none other than Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Maul. The first glimpse of what Kenobi does after that though appears in a non-canon story called “ Old Wounds” by Aaron McBride in the comic Star Wars: Visionaries. Obviously the first thing on Kenobi’s to-do list is to get baby Luke to the Lars homestead. Not only does Kenobi get into some action, but his adventures address a few dangling plot threads and, in one case, offer an alternative to the conclusion to his greatest rivalry. While we might not know quite what Deborah Chow has in mind for the Obi-Wan Kenobi Disney+ series, the original Expanded Universe timeline has some fairly interesting events.
I am also glad we don't have to think about the logistics and geography of our sex life every time the mood strikes.Love or hate the Star Wars prequels, there’s a big question left hanging in the air that it seems everyone wants to explore: What did the famous Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi do for 20 years after Revenge of the Sith while he waited for Luke to come of age to be trained as a Jedi? Presumably the original answer was just that he lived a humble life on Tatooine, but it seems no matter the timeline, something big happens in-between Kenobi’s days as a renowned Jedi General in the Grand Army of the Republic and his final years as a hermit. With our kids asleep in bunk beds about six feet away. If they catch us I can always explain that mommy and daddy were wrestling (just like the Romans!).Īre you ready for a little over-share? Stop reading here if the answer is no. It doesn't come up often (the kids are in their own room), but I am not too worried about it when it does. I don't have a big problem with having sex in the same room as my kids.
Plus, to my mind, a healthy, happy marriage is as much a part of a strong family as healthy, secure children. And I am not going to let it go to waste. We bought that nice mattress for two things: sleep and sex. To me this sounds like way too big a sacrifice. Baby number two was conceived in a hot tub (chicka chicka bow bow) and sometimes, after the kids were asleep, they would sneak off to the couch and get a little action there. We have friends who did the family bed thing until their oldest was about 10. Still, needs are needs and sex is an important part of a relationship, so what do all those co-sleepers do?Īnd what about when baby grows up a little? There is nothing wrong with having sex while baby snoozes nearby, or even in the same bed (unless you're the types who roll around like Roman wrestlers).īut the truth is, most people are a little uncomfortable doing the nasty in the same bed, or even the same room, as their babies and small children. They slept with us in Arm's Reach co-sleepers for the first four months and honestly, although I am sure we probably had sex during that time, I certainly have no memory of it (don't tell the Mister we'll let him go on thinking it was spectacular).
0 kommentar(er)
